| Human Effects on Climate | 
  
    |  | 
  
    | Key Terms | 
  
    | natural "greenhouse" effects | 
  
    | enhanced "greenhouse" effects | 
  
    | Why the term "greenhouse" is a misnomer? | 
  
    | Sources and sinks of greenhouse gases; greenhouse gas 
    concentrations, trends, lifetime, and degree of forcing relative to carbon 
    dioxide | 
  
    | Renewable and nonrenewable resources; fossil fuels | 
  
    | Carbon storages in the Earth's climate system | 
  
    | Time scales of carbon cycling, and related processes | 
  
    | Photosynthesis and respiration | 
  
    | Missing carbon sink | 
  
    | Uncertainties of global warming | 
  
    | GCMs and their performance in simulating climate change | 
  
    | Ozone hole | 
  
    | The role of ozone as a greenhouse gas and a pollutant 
    Review Questions What are the three categories of UV radiation? Which of these are 
    considered to be biologically harmful? What is ozone column depth? In what units is it measured? How do nitrogen and chlorine catalyze the destruction of ozone? What role do polar stratospheric clouds play in the formation of the 
    Antarctic ozone hole? Why is a springtime ozone hole observed over the Antarctic but not over 
    the Arctic? What strategies have been adopted for reducing or eliminating the use of 
    freons? 
      
        | Critical-Thinking Problem: Is ozone depletion of proven 
        significance enough to warrant government regulation of CFC's? 
        P.Zurer would argue Yes for the following reasons: 
          Because CFC's work
          
          catalytically , a small amount of CFC's can deplete a huge amount 
          of ozone. CFC's take up to 15 years to reach the stratosphere but can 
          stay in the atmosphere from 50-200 years. This means that the 
          relatively small depletions in ozone seen now will get much larger as 
          CFC's that have already been released accumulate in the stratosphere.
          Large amounts of lab evidence prove a number of pathways by which 
          chlorine and bromine destroy ozone in carefully simulated 
          stratospheric conditions. There is more than sufficient evidence 
          for significant CFC-caused ozone depletion. The simultaneous rise of 
          CFC's and free chlorine in the stratosphere coupled with a 
          corresponding decrease in ozone have been repeatedly shown, both over 
          time and and latitude as one approaches the south pole:  
          
          Al Globus adds a summary in favor of intervention: There are 
          readily available examples in both math and science where small 
          changes made to apparently stable systems radically change the system. 
          Making poorly understood global changes to vital resources, such as 
          the air we breath, is unwise.  |    | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    | Additional Readings: | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    | 
    Last updated on
    12/08/09 02:52 PM by Zong-Liang Yang |