|
Human Effects on Climate |
| |
| Key Terms |
| natural "greenhouse" effects |
| enhanced "greenhouse" effects |
| Why the term "greenhouse" is a misnomer? |
| Sources and sinks of greenhouse gases; greenhouse gas
concentrations, trends, lifetime, and degree of forcing relative to carbon
dioxide |
| Renewable and nonrenewable resources; fossil fuels |
| Carbon storages in the Earth's climate system |
| Time scales of carbon cycling, and related processes |
| Photosynthesis and respiration |
| Missing carbon sink |
| Uncertainties of global warming |
| GCMs and their performance in simulating climate change |
| Ozone hole |
| The role of ozone as a greenhouse gas and a pollutant
Review Questions
What are the three categories of UV radiation? Which of these are
considered to be biologically harmful?
What is ozone column depth? In what units is it measured?
How do nitrogen and chlorine catalyze the destruction of ozone?
What role do polar stratospheric clouds play in the formation of the
Antarctic ozone hole?
Why is a springtime ozone hole observed over the Antarctic but not over
the Arctic?
What strategies have been adopted for reducing or eliminating the use of
freons?
Critical-Thinking Problem: Is ozone depletion of proven
significance enough to warrant government regulation of CFC's?
P.Zurer would argue Yes for the following reasons:
- Because CFC's work
catalytically , a small amount of CFC's can deplete a huge amount
of ozone. CFC's take up to 15 years to reach the stratosphere but can
stay in the atmosphere from 50-200 years. This means that the
relatively small depletions in ozone seen now will get much larger as
CFC's that have already been released accumulate in the stratosphere.
- Large amounts of lab evidence prove a number of pathways by which
chlorine and bromine destroy ozone in carefully simulated
stratospheric conditions.
- There is more than sufficient evidence
for significant CFC-caused ozone depletion. The simultaneous rise of
CFC's and free chlorine in the stratosphere coupled with a
corresponding decrease in ozone have been repeatedly shown, both over
time and and latitude as one approaches the south pole:
- Al Globus adds a summary in favor of intervention: There are
readily available examples in both math and science where small
changes made to apparently stable systems radically change the system.
Making poorly understood global changes to vital resources, such as
the air we breath, is unwise.
|
|
| |
| |
| Additional Readings: |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Last updated on
12/08/09 02:52 PM by Zong-Liang Yang |